Přidat odpověď

zerat...nevim, jestli je to s Pumama takova vyhra...a to plati i pro ostatni znacky jako Nike, Adidas atd...

Kdyz opominu fakt, ze jsou vyrabene v zemich tretiho sveta, povetsinou v Asii a Pacifiku a dodnes (treba Puma) nema zadnou policy tykajici se child labour tak celkem nedavno se resilo jak pekne je vyroba jejich produktu toxicka (hormony specificky) a tyto spolecnosti nasledne prisahaly jak se to budou snazit eliminovat...

Takze ve zkratce tyto spolecbosti odebiraji textilie atd od (v tomto pripade) cinske spolecnosti, ktera pri jejich produkci zvladla zamorit dve reky...a tyto sajrajty, pouzivajici se na vyrobu, zustavaji ve vyrobcich...i kdyby ne ve smrtelne koncentraci...

Environmental Practices
In July 2011, Puma - along with other major sportswear brands including Nike, Adidas and Abercrombie & Fitch - was the subject of a report by the environmental group Greenpeace entitled ""Dirty Laundry"". Puma is accused of working with suppliers in China who, according the findings of the report, contribute to the pollution of the Yangtze and Pearl Rivers. Samples taken from one facility belonging to the Youngor Group located on the Yangtze River Delta and another belonging to the Well Dyeing Factory Ltd. located on a tributary of the Pearl River Delta revealed the presence of hazardous and persistent hormone disruptor chemicals, including alkylphenols, perfluorinated compounds and perfluorooctane sulfonate.[34]
Less than two weeks after the release of the Dirty Laundry report, Puma made a public commitment to deal with the issues raised by Greenpeace. The company""s statement asserts that "Puma is committed to eliminate the discharges of all hazardous chemicals from the whole lifecycle and all production procedures that are associated with the making and using of Puma products."[35] Greenpeace also confirmed Puma""s commitment to eliminate all releases of hazardous chemicals from its entire product lifecycle, and across its global supply chain by 2020.[36]